Retirement plan

401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CHICAGO URBAN L

Name: CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE - 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CHICAGO URBAN L (2019) Form 5500
Creator: CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE
License: https://www.dol.gov/general/disclaim
Keywords: Form 5500, ERISA, retirement plan, 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CHICAGO URBAN L, CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE

CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUEEIN 36-2225483Plan #003PY 2019

4510 S. MICHIGAN AVENUE - CHICAGO, IL 60653773-285-5800thechicagourbanleague.orgLinkedIn51-200 employeesnon-profit organization management

Prospect flagsLow returnsLow fidelity bond

How to read this page

Total assets (EOY)

$2.4M

+2.1% from 2018

Total participants

-27.6% from 2018

Average account balance

$29,278

+31.6% from 2018

Annual return

4.75%

-3.30 pp from 2018

Benchmarks

See 3,900 peers

Peer group

Industry61 - Educational Services

Plan typeDefined contribution

Participants25-99

Cohort3,900 peers

Snapshot2019

Free accounts unlock saves, downloads, and 3-year history.

Analytics

Total assets (EOY)

Plan-year ending balance

$3.38M

Not enough data

1 years with asset history on file

Average account balance

Total assets / participants with a balance (line 6g)

$29K

Not enough data

1 years with per-participant data

Participants with account balance

Stacked by status: active / separated vested / retired or beneficiary. Total = line 6g.

118

Not enough data

1 years with headcount on file

Eligible Participants and Participation

Bars: eligible actives (line 6a). Line: derived rate = active employees with a balance / 6a.

45.9%

Not enough data

1 years with eligibility data

Contributions (total)

Employer and participant dollars contributed each year

$279K

Not enough data

1 years with contributions on file

Contributions per participant

Average employer and participant contribution per enrolled participant

$2K

Not enough data

1 years with per-participant contribution data

Asset flow

BOY + contributions + return - distributions = EOY

Year

Annual return

Diverging bars; negative years highlighted

+13.24%

Not enough data

1 years with return on file

Admin fee / account holder

Total admin expenses / participants with a balance (line 6g)

$115

Not enough data

1 years with admin cost on file

Asset composition

Cash / stocks / bonds / mutual funds / real estate / loans over time

Not enough data

1 years with F_SCH_H allocation on file

Free accounts unlock saves, downloads, and 3-year history.

Service providers

Top 2 by compensation

Provider	Service type	Compensation
ADP BROKER-DEALER1 year Filed as: ADP, LLC Service code 15 · EIN 13-3036745	Recordkeeping	$13,722
ADP BROKER-DEALER1 year Service code 59 · EIN 22-3319984	Shareholder Servicing	$0

Plan features & details

Pension benefit codes2E2F2G2J2K2T3D

Plan features

2E
Profit-sharing
Profit-sharing plan.
2F
ERISA section 404(c) plan
This plan or any part of it is intended to meet the conditions of 29 CFR 2550.404c-1 (shifting investment responsibility to participants).
2G
Total participant-directed account plan
Participants have the opportunity to direct the investment of all of the assets allocated to their individual accounts regardless of whether 29 CFR 2550.404c-1 is intended to be met.
2J
Code section 401(k) feature
Cash or deferred arrangement described in Code section 401(k) that is part of a qualified defined contribution plan under which employees may elect to defer part of their compensation or receive these amounts in cash.
2K
Code section 401(m) arrangement
Employee contributions are allocated to separate accounts under the plan or employer contributions are based in whole or in part on employee deferrals or contributions to the plan. Not applicable to 401(k) plans with only QNECs and/or QMACs or to 403(b)(1) 403(b)(7) or 408 arrangements.
2T
Default investment account
Total or partial participant-directed account plan where plan uses a default investment account for participants who fail to direct assets in their account.
3D
Pre-approved pension plan
A master prototype or volume submitter plan that is the subject of a favorable opinion or advisory letter from the IRS.

Opportunity flags

2 tripped

OpportunityLow returns
Annual investment return is in the bottom quintile of the peer cohort.
ComplianceLow fidelity bond
Fidelity bond coverage is below the ERISA section 412 10%-of-assets minimum (capped at $500,000).

Expense breakdown

Schedule H Part II

Admin total

$20K

$341 / participant

Other / not subdivided$20K100.0%

% of EOY assets

0.828%

all-in expense ratio

Categories reported

0 / 9

subdivided buckets used

Audit opinion

Schedule H Part III

Disclaimer opinion

Auditor declined to express an opinion - usually a 103(a)(3)(C) limited-scope election.

Auditor firm: RINGOLD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SER
Auditor EIN: 364583118
Audit fees: (not subdivided)
Opinion code: Disclaimer

Metric

This plan

Peer set

Industry

Size

Avg account balance

$29,278

$45,082-35.1%

$69,464-57.9%

$72,975-59.9%

Participation rate

84.7%

68.5%+16.3pp

74.6%+10.1pp

69.5%+15.3pp

Annual return

4.75%

22.66%-17.9pp

28.98%-24.2pp

81.01%-76.3pp

Employer contribution / active EE

$1,095

$2,055-46.7%

$2,779-60.6%

$2,440-55.1%

Participant deferral / active EE

$1,962

$2,604-24.6%

$3,536-44.5%

$3,608-45.6%

Admin fee / account holder

$242

$3,057-92.1%

$3,840-93.7%

$5,124-95.3%

Provider

Service type

Compensation

ADP BROKER-DEALER1 year

Filed as: ADP, LLC

Service code 15 · EIN 13-3036745

Recordkeeping

$13,722

ADP BROKER-DEALER1 year

Service code 59 · EIN 22-3319984

Shareholder Servicing

401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CHICAGO URBAN L

Summary metrics

Benchmarksi

Analytics

Service providersi

Plan features & details

Opportunity flagsi

Expense breakdowni

Audit opinioni

401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CHICAGO URBAN L

Summary metrics

Benchmarksi

Analytics

Service providersi

Plan features & details

Opportunity flagsi

Expense breakdowni

Audit opinioni

Benchmarks

Service providers

Opportunity flags

Expense breakdown

Audit opinion

Benchmarks

Service providers

Opportunity flags

Expense breakdown

Audit opinion