| Broker | Address | Carrier | Commissions | Fees | Total comp | % of premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BXS INSURANCE INC3 Filed as: CADENCE INSURANCE INC | 16 THOMPSON PARK HATTIESBURG, MS 39401 | UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY | $15K | $81K | $96K | 3.67% |
| LUNDY R GUNN JR3 | 2090 OLD TAYLOR RD STE 104 OXFORD, MS 386555019 | UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | $5K | — | $5K | 15.00% |
No Schedule C service providers reported on this filing.
Benefits declared on the Form 5500 main form (✓ = also has a Schedule A insurance contract; otherwise the benefit is funded out of plan assets or via a Schedule C TPA).
The plan reports several different headcounts depending on which form you read. Each one measures a different slice of the population.
| Active participants | 500 | Currently employed and enrolled or eligible. |
| Total participants (= "Plan participants" tile) | 500 | Active + retired/separated + beneficiaries. No dependents. |
| Coverage | Top carrier | Persons covered EOY | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health (medical) | UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY | 500 | $2.6M |
| Dental | UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY | 500 | $2.6M |
| Short-term disability | UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | 345 | $32K |
| Persons covered (= "Persons covered" tile) | Max across the rows above | 500 | — |
Why the numbers differ. Form 5500 line 6 counts employees + retirees + beneficiaries; no dependents. Schedule A persons-covered counts everyone enrolled, including spouses and children, so it usually exceeds line 6 by 30-60% on a working-age workforce. The medical row is normally the broadest single line because it has the highest take-up; dental/vision/life often dip below it. Stop-loss / reinsurance contracts sometimes report the carrier's full underwriting pool rather than this filer's headcount; the row is shown for transparency but shouldn't be read as "people in this plan."
Top carrier holds >85% of premium. If that carrier hits a rate increase, the entire plan moves.
Premium per covered life exceeds 2× the peer median for this NAICS + size cohort. Either richly-funded plan or struggling with a bad rate.