Retirement plan

GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN

Name: GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. - GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN (2017) Form 5500
Creator: GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC.
License: https://www.dol.gov/general/disclaim
Keywords: Form 5500, ERISA, retirement plan, GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN, GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC.

GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC.EIN 58-2145819Plan #001PY 2017

4276 CANTRELL RD NW - ACWORTH, GA 301013707770-966-1660gardnermetal.comLinkedIn51-200 employeesconstruction

Prospect flagsHigh feesLow participation

How to read this page

Total assets (EOY)

$3.5M

+19.1% from 2016

Total participants

129

-5.8% from 2016

Average account balance

$51,911

+38.4% from 2016

Annual return

13.54%

+5.72 pp from 2016

Benchmarks

See 4,147 peers

Peer group

Industry33 - Manufacturing

Plan typeDefined contribution

Participants100-249

Cohort4,147 peers

Snapshot2017

Free accounts unlock saves, downloads, and 3-year history.

Analytics

Total assets (EOY)

Plan-year ending balance

$8.31M

Not enough data

1 years with asset history on file

Average account balance

Total assets / participants with a balance (line 6g)

$136K

Not enough data

1 years with per-participant data

Participants with account balance

Stacked by status: active / separated vested / retired or beneficiary. Total = line 6g.

Not enough data

1 years with headcount on file

Eligible Participants and Participation

Bars: eligible actives (line 6a). Line: derived rate = active employees with a balance / 6a.

60.4%

Not enough data

1 years with eligibility data

Contributions (total)

Employer and participant dollars contributed each year

$550K

Not enough data

1 years with contributions on file

Contributions per participant

Average employer and participant contribution per enrolled participant

$5K

Not enough data

1 years with per-participant contribution data

Asset flow

BOY + contributions + return - distributions = EOY

Year

Annual return

Diverging bars; negative years highlighted

+11.71%

Not enough data

1 years with return on file

Admin fee / account holder

Total admin expenses / participants with a balance (line 6g)

$12787

Not enough data

1 years with admin cost on file

Asset composition

Cash / stocks / bonds / mutual funds / real estate / loans over time

Not enough data

0 years with F_SCH_H allocation on file

Free accounts unlock saves, downloads, and 3-year history.

Service providers

Top 2 by compensation

Provider	Service type	Compensation
SENTARA CAPITAL2 years Service code 26 · EIN 45-4276691	Advisory (Participants)	$15,885
THE CHEROKEE BENEFITS GROUP, INC.2 years Service code 15 · EIN 58-2229338	Recordkeeping	$11,100

Plan features & details

Pension benefit codes2E2F2G2J2K2T3D

Plan features

2E
Profit-sharing
Profit-sharing plan.
2F
ERISA section 404(c) plan
This plan or any part of it is intended to meet the conditions of 29 CFR 2550.404c-1 (shifting investment responsibility to participants).
2G
Total participant-directed account plan
Participants have the opportunity to direct the investment of all of the assets allocated to their individual accounts regardless of whether 29 CFR 2550.404c-1 is intended to be met.
2J
Code section 401(k) feature
Cash or deferred arrangement described in Code section 401(k) that is part of a qualified defined contribution plan under which employees may elect to defer part of their compensation or receive these amounts in cash.
2K
Code section 401(m) arrangement
Employee contributions are allocated to separate accounts under the plan or employer contributions are based in whole or in part on employee deferrals or contributions to the plan. Not applicable to 401(k) plans with only QNECs and/or QMACs or to 403(b)(1) 403(b)(7) or 408 arrangements.
2T
Default investment account
Total or partial participant-directed account plan where plan uses a default investment account for participants who fail to direct assets in their account.
3D
Pre-approved pension plan
A master prototype or volume submitter plan that is the subject of a favorable opinion or advisory letter from the IRS.

Opportunity flags

2 tripped

OpportunityLow participation
Participation rate is below 70% (account-balance holders / active employees) - enrollment or auto-enroll opportunity.
OpportunityHigh fees
Administrative expenses exceed $300 per participant per year - possible fee-review opportunity. (Recordkeeping / audit / legal; excludes investment management.)

Expense breakdown

Schedule H Part II

Admin total

$28K

$260 / participant

Investment mgmt$16K56.5%
Other / not subdivided$12K43.5%

% of EOY assets

0.797%

all-in expense ratio

Categories reported

1 / 9

subdivided buckets used

Audit opinion

Schedule H Part III

Disclaimer opinion

Auditor declined to express an opinion - usually a 103(a)(3)(C) limited-scope election.

Auditor firm: HOLLAND SHIPES PENNIX LLP
Auditor EIN: 471471220
Audit fees: (not subdivided)
Opinion code: Disclaimer

Metric

This plan

Peer set

Industry

Size

Avg account balance

$51,911

$64,909-20.0%

$82,312-36.9%

$62,293-16.7%

Participation rate

43.5%

74.9%-31.3pp

76.9%-33.4pp

69.5%-26.0pp

Annual return

13.54%

21.18%-7.6pp

25.88%-12.3pp

28.90%-15.4pp

Employer contribution / active EE

$1,056

$1,676-37.0%

$2,428-56.5%

$2,042-48.3%

Participant deferral / active EE

$2,010

$3,103-35.2%

$3,706-45.8%

$3,169-36.6%

Admin fee / account holder

$414

$440-5.9%

$5,608-92.6%

$479-13.7%

Provider

Service type

Compensation

SENTARA CAPITAL2 years

Service code 26 · EIN 45-4276691

Advisory (Participants)

$15,885

THE CHEROKEE BENEFITS GROUP, INC.2 years

Service code 15 · EIN 58-2229338

Recordkeeping

$11,100

GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN

Summary metrics

Benchmarksi

Analytics

Service providersi

Plan features & details

Opportunity flagsi

Expense breakdowni

Audit opinioni

GARDNER METAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN

Summary metrics

Benchmarksi

Analytics

Service providersi

Plan features & details

Opportunity flagsi

Expense breakdowni

Audit opinioni

Benchmarks

Service providers

Opportunity flags

Expense breakdown

Audit opinion

Benchmarks

Service providers

Opportunity flags

Expense breakdown

Audit opinion