NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
3 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served3Rank #3354 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$2.9B0.0%Market share · rank #2589
Fees received$37,900Median $9,000/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY+01 won · 1 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Other services; Direct payment from the planCode 49 | 3 | $9,000 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|---|---|
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 224 PENSION FUND BD OF TRUSTEESMI · 316171353-001 | ULLICO | $76M |
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|---|---|
NORTHWEST IRONWORKERS RETIREMENT PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEESWA · 916123688-001 | WELFARE & PENSION ADMIN SERVICE INC | $708M |
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTL PENSION FD BD OF TRUSTEEDC · 526127746-001 | $1.9B | 76,992 | $23,800 | 4y | - |
UFCW UNION & PARTICIPATING FOOD INDUSTRY EMPLOYERS TRI-STATE PENSION FPA · 236396097-001 | $872M | 29,592 | $9,000 | 3y | - |
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 224 PENSION FUND BD OF TRUSTEESMI · 316171353-001 | $76M | 795 | $5,100 | 1y | - |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.2%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (3)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE.
- NATIONAL COORDINATING
- NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
- NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE MP
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /retirement size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.71% | -1.71 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%+0.0 pp vs incumbent