KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
7 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served6Rank #1730 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$16.2B0.0%Market share · rank #676
Fees received$143,778Median $13,357/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY+15 won · 4 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Legal; Non-monetary compensationCode 29 | 5 | $10,955 | |
Contract AdministratorCode 13 | 1 | $35,656 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|---|---|
SHELL USA, INC.TX · 131299890-001 | METLIFE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | $9.7B |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PENTEGRA DEFINED BENEFIT PLANNY · 135645888-333 | DYAL III PENSION INVESTORS LP | $3.2B |
DUKE UNIVERSITYNC · 560532129-002 | SCF-IX, L.P. | $2.6B |
XEROX CORPORATIONCT · 160468020-335 | DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP | $1.5B |
AMPEX CORPORATIONCT · 133667696-009 | PINNACLE ASSOCIATES LTD | $109M |
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|---|---|
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONNY · 130871985-001 | NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY | $25.0B |
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EQUITY-LEAGUE PENSION TRUST FUNDNY · 136696817-001 | GLENDON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP | $2.0B |
BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH, INC.MA · 832671600-001 | BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH | $671M |
NAVISTAR, INC.IL · 361264810-037 | AON CONSULTING | $462M |
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHELL USA, INC.TX · 131299890-001 | $9.7B | 31,775 | $35,656 | 1y | - |
DUKE UNIVERSITYNC · 560532129-002 | $2.8B | 40,202 | $5,624 | 2y | 1 |
NATIONAL ROOFING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND WILSON-MCSHANE CORPORATIONMN · 366157071-001 | $2.1B | 33,266 | $65,695 | 5y | - |
XEROX CORPORATIONCT · 160468020-335 | $1.5B | 13,527 | $10,955 | 1y | - |
AMPEX CORPORATIONCT · 133667696-009 | $109M | 1,238 | $15,759 | 1y | - |
BAYSTATE HEALTH, INC.MA · 042105941-001 | $7M | 0 | $10,089 | 2y | - |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.2%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (7)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP.
- KIRKLAND & ELLIS
- KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
- KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP
- KIRKLAND AND ELLIS
- KIRKLAND AND ELLIS LLP
- KIRKLAND ELLIS LLP
- KIRKLAND SHARED SERVICES
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /retirement size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 1 | 16.67% | 1.71% | +14.95 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent