DLA PIPER
9 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served8-2 YoYRank #1393 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$16.8B0.0%Market share · rank #757
Fees received$467,496Median $38,380/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY-12 won · 3 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical DLA PIPER plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where DLA PIPER ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Legal; Direct payment from the planCode 29 | 6 | $62,669 | |
Consulting (general)Code 16 | 1 | $25,263 | |
Investment advisory (plan); Direct payment from the planCode 27 | 1 | $5,195 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of DLA PIPER's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under DLA PIPER.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|---|---|
QUALCOMM INCORPORATEDCA · 953685934-001 | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP | $9.7B |
EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANYCT · 060810627-005 | PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT INSURANCE AND | $4.0B |
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under DLA PIPER; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|---|---|
BRITISH AIRWAYS PLCNY · 131546240-001 | RUSSELL TRUST COMPANY | $267M |
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES SERVICES, INC.DC · 522185034-001 | TIAA | $49M |
LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLANMD · 520749130-002 | CARDAY ASSOCIATES | $4M |
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUALCOMM INCORPORATEDCA · 953685934-001 | $9.7B | 23,062 | $73,841 | 8y | 2 |
EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANYCT · 060810627-005 | $4.0B | 14,558 | $10,017 | 1y | - |
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.NC · 841496755-001 | $2.3B | 34,730 | $116,794 | 2y | - |
DANIEL J. EDELMAN HOLDINGS, INC.IL · 800830746-002 | $544M | 5,561 | $25,263 | 2y | 1 |
LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION AND DISABILITY TRUST FUND NO. 2MD · 520749130-001 | $146M | 4,494 | $163,708 | 2y | - |
KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.NY · 113072607-001 | $57M | 547 | $51,497 | 8y | - |
MINER ENTERPRISES, INCIL · 362694314-002 | $48M | 485 | $5,195 | 8y | - |
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, WASHINGTON DC CEMENT MASONS' PENSION TRUST FUNDMD · 526134655-001 | $26M | 737 | $21,181 | 2y | - |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.2%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (9)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into DLA PIPER.
- DLA PIPER
- DLA PIPER LLP
- DLA PIPER LLP (US)
- DLA PIPER LLP US
- DLA PIPER LLPUS
- DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY
- DLA PIPER RUDNICK LLP
- DLA PIPER, LLP
- DLA PPIPER
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /retirement size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for DLA PIPER's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 1 | 12.50% | 1.71% | +10.79 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 2 | 25.00% | 1.76% | +23.24 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with DLA PIPER. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent