DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I
2 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served4+2 YoYRank #2575 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$5.6B0.0%Market share · rank #1736
Fees received$67,544Median $17,610/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY+22 won · 0 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Investment advisory (participants); Direct payment from the planCode 26 | 4 | $17,610 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|---|---|
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.IN · 351955872-005 | GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE | $4.5B |
N.A. WILLIAMS CO. INC.GA · 580669636-001 | (new plan) | $44M |
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.IN · 351955872-005 | $4.5B | 51,880 | $10,720 | 1y | - |
BARNES & THORNBURG LLPIN · 350900596-002 | $754M | 1,916 | $21,604 | 8y | - |
ICE MILLER LLPIN · 350874357-003 | $371M | 916 | $19,878 | 5y | 1 |
N.A. WILLIAMS CO. INC.GA · 580669636-001 | $44M | 134 | $15,342 | 1y | - |
Flag exposure
75.0%Market: 89.2%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (2)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I.
- DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS
- DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /retirement size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.71% | -1.71 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 1 | 25.00% | 1.76% | +23.24 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with DEERFIELD FINANCIAL ADVISORS I. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent