Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management
advisor15 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served6Rank #2235 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$23.2B0.0%Market share · rank #602
Fees received$2MMedian $230,253/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY+00 won · 0 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Soft dollars commissions; Direct payment from the plan; Securities brokerage commissions and fees; Investment managementCode 28 | 3 | $364,091 | |
Investment management fees paid directly by planCode 51 | 2 | $66,296 | |
Investment management; Investment management fees paid indirectly by plan; Investment advisory (plan); Investment management fees paid directly by planCode 27 | 1 | $840,657 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONNJ · 134994650-001 | $16.1B | 202,919 | $840,657 | 6y | - |
SIEMENS ENERGY, INC.FL · 133987280-021 | $4.0B | 15,538 | $364,091 | 5y | - |
JOINT BOARD OF TRUSTEES ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUNDAK · 926005171-001 | $2.1B | 11,263 | $420,794 | 10y | - |
ROCHESTER GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEMNY · 222551509-001 | $717M | 15,575 | $96,414 | 7y | - |
UNITY HEALTH SYSTEMNY · 222572873-001 | $343M | 10,232 | $36,177 | 7y | - |
ALKEGENCT · 060865505-020 | $34M | 364 | $0 | 5y | - |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.1%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (15)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management.
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAP MGMT
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAP MGMT LLC
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MGMG LLC
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MGMT
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY CAPITAL MGMT LLC
- HOTCHKIS & WILEY, LLC
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY CAPITAL
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY CAPITAL MGMT
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY CAPITAL MGMT LLC
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY CAPITAL MGMT,LLC
- HOTCHKIS AND WILEY CAPITAL MGMT.
- HOTCHKISS AND WILEY CAPITAL MANAGEM
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /plans size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.71% | -1.71 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent
Frequent partners by role
Who else shows up on Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management's plans most often. Switch tabs by counterparty role - high-overlap names are either referral channels (advisors, auditors) or competitive blocks (other recordkeepers).
| Partner | Shared plans | % of book |
|---|---|---|
| Barlow Coughran Morales & Josephson | 1 | 16.7% |
| Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith | 1 | 16.7% |
| Proskauer Rose LLP | 1 | 16.7% |