Global Infrastructure Partners
advisor15 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served6-2 YoYRank #2263 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$18.6B0.0%Market share · rank #737
Fees received$3MMedian $557,992/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY-20 won · 2 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical Global Infrastructure Partners plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where Global Infrastructure Partners ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Investment management; Investment management fees paid directly by planCode 28 | 5 | $770,635 | |
Investment management fees paid directly by planCode 51 | 1 | $149,565 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of Global Infrastructure Partners's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under Global Infrastructure Partners.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under Global Infrastructure Partners; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|---|---|
HIGHMARK HEALTHPA · 453674900-333 | NEPC LLC | $3.3B |
BD TTEES SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 100 WASHINGTONOR · 526038495-001 | KOHLBERG KRAVIS ROBERTS & CO. L.P. | $348M |
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELLS FARGO & COMPANYMN · 410449260-001 | $8.3B | 165,927 | $770,635 | 9y | - |
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BUILDING SERVICE 32BJ PENSION FUNDNY · 131879376-001 | $4.6B | 121,234 | $836,964 | 3y | - |
BD OF TRUSTEES, LABORERS DIST COUNCIL & CONSTRS PENSION FUNDOH · 316129964-001 | $2.7B | 30,539 | $149,565 | 8y | - |
PIPELINE INDUSTRY PENSION FUNDOK · 736146433-001 | $1.7B | 7,849 | $345,349 | 9y | - |
ENBRIDGE EMPLOYEE SERVICES, INC.TX · 760697621-002 | $1.1B | 9,402 | $905,000 | 6y | - |
BOARD OF TRUSTEES IRON WORKERS PENSION PLAN OF WESTERN PAPA · 251283169-001 | $297M | 2,936 | $16,750 | 10y | - |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.1%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (15)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into Global Infrastructure Partners.
- CLEARBRIDGE MID CAP CORE I
- CLEARBRIDGE SM CAP VAL A
- GLOBAL INFRA PTNRS III-B
- GLOBAL INFRA. PARTNERS IV-A/B AIV 2
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS FD I
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS IV B
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS IV,
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS IV-B
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS V, L
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRTNRS FD III
- GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE PTNERS
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /plans size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for Global Infrastructure Partners's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.71% | -1.71 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with Global Infrastructure Partners. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent
Frequent partners by role
Who else shows up on Global Infrastructure Partners's plans most often. Switch tabs by counterparty role - high-overlap names are either referral channels (advisors, auditors) or competitive blocks (other recordkeepers).
| Partner | Shared plans | % of book |
|---|---|---|
| Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC | 1 | 16.7% |
| DiClaudio & Kramer LLC | 1 | 16.7% |
| Haynes & Boone LLP | 1 | 16.7% |
| Meyer Unkovic & Scott LLP | 1 | 16.7% |
| Proskauer Rose LLP | 1 | 16.7% |
| Raab Sturm & Ganchrow LLP | 1 | 16.7% |
| Robein, Urann, Spencer & Congemi | 1 | 16.7% |
| Tucker Arensberg | 1 | 16.7% |