Data Based Development
other1 known alias resolved via the canonical alias map
Market position · 2024
Plans served1-1 YoYRank #7900 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$41.6B0.1%Market share · rank #379
Fees received$33,737Median $33,737/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY-10 won · 1 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical Data Based Development plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where Data Based Development ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
| Service | Plans | Median fees | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
Other services; Direct payment from the planCode 49 | 1 | $33,737 |
Competitor overlap
Percent of Data Based Development's plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under Data Based Development.
| Sponsor | From | Assets |
|---|
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under Data Based Development; not this year.
| Sponsor | To | Assets |
|---|
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
| Plan | Assets | Participants | Fees | Tenure | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTX CORPORATIONCT · 060570975-041 | $41.6B | 281,638 | $33,737 | 2y | 1 |
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.1%
This provider
Market baseline
Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.
Aliases resolved (1)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into Data Based Development.
- DATA BASED DEVELOPMENT
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /plans size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for Data Based Development's book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
| Flag | Plans flagged | Provider % | Market % | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recently terminated | 0 | 0.00% | 7.76% | -7.76 pp |
| Fidelity bond gap | 0 | 0.00% | 26.94% | -26.94 pp |
| Late contributions | 1 | 100.00% | 1.71% | +98.29 pp |
| Failed to provide benefit | 0 | 0.00% | 0.14% | -0.14 pp |
| Corrective distributions | 0 | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76 pp |
| Loss discovered | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | -0.00 pp |
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with Data Based Development. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%+0.0 pp vs incumbent
Frequent partners by role
Who else shows up on Data Based Development's plans most often. Switch tabs by counterparty role - high-overlap names are either referral channels (advisors, auditors) or competitive blocks (other recordkeepers).
| Partner | Shared plans | % of book |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Hamilton & Associates | 1 | 100.0% |
| PartnerComm Inc. | 1 | 100.0% |
| Wilson McShane Corporation | 1 | 100.0% |
| WTW | 1 | 100.0% |