All providers

CEM Benchmarking Inc.

advisor

4 known aliases resolved via the canonical alias map

Market position · 2024

Plans served10+4 YoYRank #1539 of mapped providers
Assets under administration$103.9B0.1%Market share · rank #129
Fees received$326,992Median $31,214/planSum across Schedule C direct + indirect
Net wins YoY+44 won · 0 lostPlan-level switch detection
Plans served · 5-year trajectory
Market-share plans percent annotated. Bar height is raw plan count.
Customer-base shape
What does a typical CEM Benchmarking Inc. plan look like?
Service mix · median fees per plan
Count of plans where CEM Benchmarking Inc. ships each service code, and the median compensation they report under it.
ServicePlansMedian feesDistribution
Direct payment from the plan; Consulting (general)Code 16
5$25,500
Other services; Direct payment from the planCode 49
2$53,750
Valuation (appraisals, etc.); Direct payment from the planCode 34
1$31,827
Direct payment from the plan; Participant communicationCode 38
1$34,000
Direct payment from the plan; Other services; Foreign entity (e.g., an agent or broker, bank, insurance company, etc. not operating within jurisdictional boundaries of the United States)Code 40
1$37,565
Competitor overlap
Percent of CEM Benchmarking Inc.'s plans that also list each competitor on Schedule C. High numbers = co-living partners; low numbers = direct displacement targets.
Plans won in 2024
Appeared this year; did not appear last year under CEM Benchmarking Inc..
SponsorFromAssets
SHELL USA, INC.TX · 131299890-002
STW Fixed Income Management, LLC$11.5B
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATIONNJ · 223408857-003
UNITED ACTUARIAL SERVICES$9.8B
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.NY · 135009340-004
Vanguard$6.4B
CORNING INCORPORATEDNY · 160393470-002
Conduent$4.1B
Plans lost in 2024
Appeared last year under CEM Benchmarking Inc.; not this year.
SponsorToAssets
Top plans by assets
Searchable full list lands with the commercial layer.
PlanAssetsParticipantsFeesTenureFlags
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.NJ · 232259884-102
$29.4B119,145$34,0008y-
CATERPILLAR INC.TX · 370602744-035
$18.8B60,357$31,82710y-
ELI LILLY AND COMPANYIN · 350470950-002
$13.1B31,411$37,5659y-
SHELL USA, INC.TX · 131299890-002
$11.5B24,265$40,5001y1
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATIONNJ · 223408857-003
$9.8B24,880$67,0001y-
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.NY · 135009340-004
$6.4B21,431$25,5001y-
TEXTRON INC.RI · 050315468-030
$6.1B36,001$15,0003y2
CORNING INCORPORATEDNY · 160393470-002
$4.1B16,330$30,6001y1
BELLSOUTH, LLCTX · 581533433-004
$2.5B15,110$18,0004y-
AT&T INC.TX · 431301883-004
$2.3B27,558$27,0004y-
Flag exposure
100.0%Market: 89.1%
This provider
Market baseline

Share of this provider's plans tripping any deterministic red flag this year. Lower than market baseline = better risk surface.

Aliases resolved (4)
Raw Schedule C names collapsed into CEM Benchmarking Inc..
  • BBP OF DELAWARE VALLEY INC
  • CEM BENCHMARKING
  • CEM BENCHMARKING INC
  • CEM BENCHMARKING INC.
Book composition by plan size
Bars stack to total plans served; segments use the same asset cutoffs as the /plans size filter. Up-and-to-the-right on the bigger segments = moving up-market.
Under $5M$5-50M$50-250M$250M-1B$1B+
Compliance posture vs market
Per-flag share for CEM Benchmarking Inc.'s book against the same flag's overall prevalence across all filings. Negative delta = under-indexed (cleaner book); positive = elevated risk surface.
FlagPlans flaggedProvider %Market %Delta
Recently terminated00.00%7.76%-7.76 pp
Fidelity bond gap00.00%26.94%-26.94 pp
Late contributions110.00%1.71%+8.29 pp
Failed to provide benefit00.00%0.14%-0.14 pp
Corrective distributions330.00%1.76%+28.24 pp
Loss discovered00.00%0.00%-0.00 pp
New-plan formation share
Share of plans filing for the first time each year that landed with CEM Benchmarking Inc.. Compare to the incumbent market share (0.0%) - higher = winning new business, lower = coasting on existing relationships.
0.0%-0.0 pp vs incumbent
Frequent partners by role
Who else shows up on CEM Benchmarking Inc.'s plans most often. Switch tabs by counterparty role - high-overlap names are either referral channels (advisors, auditors) or competitive blocks (other recordkeepers).
PartnerShared plans% of book
New & Karfunkel PC220.0%
Proskauer Rose LLP220.0%
Day Pitney LLP110.0%
Duane Morris LLP110.0%
Eversheds Sutherland110.0%
Harter Secrest & Emery LLP110.0%
Seyfarth Shaw LLP110.0%
Thompson Hine110.0%